Weekend Project: Virtual Startup Team
Notebook: week3_multi_agent/project_startup_simulator.ipynb
The Big Question
Can a team of
gpt-4o-miniagents outperform a singlegpt-4ogenius?
In this project, we put this to the test by building a Virtual Startup Team where specialized agents collaborate to create a business pitch deck.
Project Overview
We'll compare two approaches:
| Approach | Description |
|---|---|
| Solo GPT-4o | One powerful model does everything |
| Team of Minis | CEO, CTO, CMO (all gpt-4o-mini) collaborate |
Architecture: Supervisor Pattern
The CEO acts as a Supervisor who coordinates the team:
The Challenge
Startup Idea: "Uber for Dog Walking in rural areas"
Requirements:
- Core Value Proposition
- Technology Stack
- Go-to-Market Strategy
Implementation
Step 1: Define Your Agents
AGENTS = {
"CEO": {
"model": "gpt-4o-mini",
"role": "You are the CEO. You coordinate the team and consolidate outputs."
},
"CTO": {
"model": "gpt-4o-mini",
"role": "You are the CTO. Focus on technology stack, scalability, and engineering feasibility."
},
"CMO": {
"model": "gpt-4o-mini",
"role": "You are the CMO. Focus on target audience, marketing channels, and virality."
}
}Step 2: Solo Approach
def solo_run(idea):
response = client.chat.completions.create(
model="gpt-4o",
messages=[
{"role": "system", "content": "You are a startup expert."},
{"role": "user", "content": f"Idea: {idea}\n{REQUIREMENTS}"}
]
)
return response.choices[0].message.contentStep 3: Team Approach
def ask_agent(role_name, task):
agent_cfg = AGENTS[role_name]
response = client.chat.completions.create(
model=agent_cfg["model"],
messages=[
{"role": "system", "content": agent_cfg["role"]},
{"role": "user", "content": task}
]
)
return response.choices[0].message.content
# 1. CTO analyzes tech
cto_out = ask_agent("CTO", f"Plan the tech stack for: {STARTUP_IDEA}")
# 2. CMO plans marketing
cmo_out = ask_agent("CMO", f"Plan marketing for: {STARTUP_IDEA}")
# 3. CEO synthesizes everything
final_prompt = f"""
Synthesize these reports into a 1-page pitch.
[Tech Report]
{cto_out}
[Marketing Report]
{cmo_out}
"""
team_result = ask_agent("CEO", final_prompt)Why Multi-Agent Works
| Factor | Solo Model | Team of Agents |
|---|---|---|
| Perspective | Single viewpoint | Multiple specialized viewpoints |
| Context | One huge context window | Focused, smaller contexts |
| Cost | 1× GPT-4o call | 3× GPT-4o-mini (still cheaper!) |
| Quality | Good, but generic | Specialized insights per domain |
Key Insight: The CTO agent naturally thought about "Rural Connectivity" (offline mode) because of its persona, whereas a generic single prompt might miss this domain-specific consideration.
Results Comparison
Solo GPT-4o Output
# RoverRural - Uber for Dog Walking in Rural Areas
## 1. Core Value Proposition
RoverRural revolutionizes pet care in rural communities...
[Generic, comprehensive response]Team of Minis Output
# Rural Rover - One-Page Pitch
## Overview
Combining technology with community engagement...
## Tech Stack (from CTO)
- Offline-first architecture for poor connectivity
- SMS fallback for notifications
- Low-bandwidth optimized app
## Marketing (from CMO)
- Partner with local vets and pet stores
- Community ambassador program
- Word-of-mouth in tight-knit communitiesExtend the Project
Try these challenges:
Add a CFO Agent
Create a CFO agent to calculate burn rate and funding needs
Implement Debate Mode
Let agents critique each other's proposals before final synthesis
Add Tool Access
Give agents access to web search for market research
Use CrewAI
Refactor the project using CrewAI for cleaner orchestration
Key Takeaways
- Specialization beats generalization - Focused agents produce domain-specific insights
- Context isolation - Each agent works in a clean, focused context
- Cost efficiency - Multiple small models can be cheaper than one large model
- Emergent collaboration - The synthesized output often exceeds what either approach could achieve alone
References & Further Reading
Related Papers
-
"Encouraging Divergent Thinking in Large Language Models through Multi-Agent Debate" - Liang et al., 2023
-
"MetaGPT: Meta Programming for Multi-Agent Collaborative Framework" - Hong et al., 2023
-
"ChatDev: Communicative Agents for Software Development" - Qian et al., 2023
What's Next?
Congratulations on completing Week 3! You've learned:
- Router agents for task delegation
- Collaboration patterns between agents
- Supervisor hierarchies
- MCP for standardized tool integration
- CrewAI for rapid multi-agent development
In Week 4, we'll focus on Production Engineering—taking your agents from prototype to production with evaluation, guardrails, and deployment.
Run the Notebook
jupyter notebook week3_multi_agent/project_startup_simulator.ipynb